A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
refers to regulation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And the way They may be applied in certain types of case.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC offers with the death penalty as being the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may very well be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to do absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
It is now nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different, therefore, inside our view the learned Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner via the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
Please use a single username and password established from the options. If it does not work please consider the other. Each allows single person access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have completed your session in Manupatra.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion could be considered, however, we are apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy matter towards the approval from the competent authority. Read more
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge on the Judgment within time. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars given that arrest, investigation of your case is complete, he isn't any more expected to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him powering the bars before summary of trial will serve no useful purpose.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
3. Rule of Law: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and making certain that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property also can sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority check here but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]